Framework & Approach

A Prevention Science Framework for Trauma-Informed Workforce Development

PREVENTION FRAMEWORK FOR TRAUMA-INFORMED WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Author: Aaron Johnson, MS

Affiliation: Johnson Mapenzi Consulting Group (JMCG)

Institution: University of Cincinnati, Community Health & Prevention Science

Year: 2025

This research-to-practice framework translates prevention science principles into actionable strategies for workforce development systems. JMCG implements this framework across organizational consulting engagements.

Most workforce development operates from a scarcity model: get people employed quickly, measure success by placement rates, move resources to the next cohort.

This approach assumes employment itself is curative, that a paycheck will solve the accumulated effects of chronic stress and systemic harm.

But economic mobility without healing is just moving trauma from one zip code to another.

Research shows that adults with 4+ adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are 2.5 times more likely to experience unemployment. These aren't character flaws; they're predictable, patterned responses to harm that workforce programs routinely pathologize as "soft skill deficits.

The Core Insight

“Workforce development that ignores trauma doesn’t develop a workforce; it extracts labor from people who are still trying to survive.”

The Problem

The Problem: Traditional Models Extract Labor Without Building Capacity

Our prevention framework systematically reduces risk factors while

strengthening protective factors at three levels: program, workplace,

and systems.

The Framework: Upstream Prevention Through Trauma-Informed Systems Practice

REDUCE RISK FACTORS

Program Level:

- Burnout among staff and participants

- Punitive, surveillance-based cultures

- Partnerships with exploitative employers

Workplace Level:

- Chronic stressors (wage theft, discrimination)

- Control-based management

- Absence of worker protections

Systems Level:

- Benefits tied to employment (coercive)

- Structural barriers programs can't address alone

- Quality jobs concentrated in credentialed fields

STRENGTHEN PROTECTIVE FACTORS

Program Level:

- Belonging and relational safety

- Supportive, non-coercive coaching

- Peer cohorts and mutual aid

Workplace Level:

- Living wages and comprehensive benefits

- Participatory cultures with advancement pathways

- Accommodation of caregiving and health needs

Systems Level:

- Decouple survival needs from employment

- Investment in care infrastructure

- Cross-sector partnerships addressing root causes

WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE IN PRACTICE

- See people as whole (not just job seekers)

- Build trust over time through consistency

- Interrogate partnerships (refuse exploitative employers)

- Treat organizational culture as intervention

- Measure what matters (retention, health, well-being)

Evidence from 12+ Years of Practice

Downloads & Resources

Ready to implement trauma-informed practice in your organization?

Whether you're a funder looking to shift investment strategies, a program leader building capacity, or an organization committed to centering healing alongside economic mobility, this framework can guide your work.

Let's talk about what trauma-informed workforce development looks like in your context.